Thumbnail_(2)_ET

Shaping Research Narratives: Dr. Emmanuel Tsekleves’ tips for ESL researchers

By Enago Academy | Speaker: Dr. Emmanuel Tsekleves

In this insightful episode of “Research and Beyond”, we discuss the nuances of academic writing for English as a Second Language (ESL) authors and researchers with Dr. Emmanuel Tsekleves. Dr. Tsekleves, the director of the Future Cities Research Institute, is an expert academic and mentor with an experience of over two decades.

In this conversation, he shares strategies for structuring manuscripts like compelling narratives and crafting plain language summaries to resonate your research with a wider audience.

Key topics discussed:

  • Techniques for transforming research findings into engaging narratives
  • Tips for ESL researchers to adopt storytelling format
  • Strategies for aligning research with journal submission guidelines
  • Best practices for writing impactful ‘Discussion’ section

Disclaimer: The subtitles are AI-generated. While efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, occasional errors or omissions may occur

Whether you’re an ESL researcher or looking to improve your academic writing, this episode brings you the right insights to help you excel. Dive into the conversation now!

Rate this article

Rating*

Your email address will not be published.

We Recommend

Overcoming Language Barriers in Global Research: Dr. Jamal El Ouahi on research communication

Effective communication is at the heart of advancing science — especially when bridging the gap…

Dr. Jamal El Ouahi

Shaping Research Narratives: Dr. Emmanuel Tsekleves’ insights for academic storytelling

Storytelling has a remarkable ability to distill complex ideas and make research accessible to everyone.…

Dr. Emmanuel Tsekleves

Leading Ethical Change: Dr. Jigisha Patel’s take on safeguarding research integrity

“Integrity isn’t an extra step in research — it is the heart of the scientific…

Dr. Jigisha Patel
[contact-form-7 id="40123" title="Global popup two"]





    Researchers' Poll

    How do you usually handle peer reviewer comments?