Retractions, Whistleblowers, and the Quest for Scientific Truth: A conversation with Ivan Oransky

By Enago Academy | Speaker: Dr. Ivan Oransky

Research integrity is the backbone of authentic and reliable scientific investigation. The alarming rise in retraction numbers has highlighted the critical need for maintaining high standards. In our podcast, Research and Beyond, join us for a captivating conversation with Ivan Oransky, co-founder of Retraction Watch, as we delve into the world of research integrity and the transformative impact of exposing misconduct.

Key topics explored in the topic:

  • Insights into why researchers engage in unethical practices
  • Challenges faced by whistle-blowers exposing the misconducts
  • The impact of retractions on the scholarly community
  • Scientific community’s response to the reported misconducts against them
  • Tips for investigators reporting misconduct

This episode will not only inform but also inspire you to uphold the highest standards of integrity in your scientific endeavors. Tune in for the podcast to gain indispensable knowledge with help of unique metaphor for eliminating misconduct and promoting research integrity.

Rate this article

Rating*

Your email address will not be published.

We Recommend

Ethics Under the Microscope: Dr. Elizabeth Bik on image manipulation and AI

“Science detectives are the unsung heroes of research integrity, uncovering hidden truths and safeguarding the…

Dr. Elizabeth Bik

Intersection of Science and Creativity: A conversation with science advocate Dr. Jayshree Seth

“To raise new questions, new possibilities, to regard old problems from a new angle requires…

Dr. Jayshree Seth

Advancing Open Science: Leadership, inclusivity, and global collaboration- A conversation with Matthew Buys

We are back with another exciting episode of ‘Research and Beyond’ where we explore the…

Matthew Buys
[contact-form-7 id="40123" title="Global popup two"]





    Researchers' Poll

    Which among these would you prefer the most for improving research integrity?